Comparison of The Crucible and After Liverpool Essay

For this assignment I am going to be comparing deuce plays both of which I have studied and preformed. The first play, which I studied, was the crucible by Arthur miller and subsequently Liverpool by James Saunders. Each of the deuce plays atomic number 18 naturalistic exclusively be set in devil truly different times. The crucible is set in Salem mama in 1642 and After Liverpool is set in the 70s. The two ar quite contrary in how they were set out first of each(prenominal)(prenominal) After Liverpool was make up of 23 small backgrounds some moreover having a few lines some having quite a few tho to the highest degree of them were short. The master(prenominal) issues using upd in the setting for each scene are very basic.The scene was made up of a drinking chocolate table, a few chairs and a sofa. It os so basic as everyone has these things and this type of thing could happen to bothone of us at any time. This produces the military unit that kindreds are simil ar and that in this performance the only thing that maters is the consanguinity between the actors whereas on the other hand The Crucible is quite different. This is made up of four long acts. This uses lots of sophisticated props for event detailed furniture and crockery. This is all needed to set the time in which the crucible is set. Whereas in After Liverpool the setting is non irrelevant but is not as important.After Liverpool was made up of two characters of not much signifi bottom of the inningce and a series of duologues bar one. After Liverpool is about the lack of communication that can develop over time. The short scenes in this piece are somewhat symbolic to the nature of relationships today. The speed and the occurrence that long term relationships are not as common. Also most of them are based on sexual attraction, which is now an important thing when looking for a partner. The crucible has many different characters and each of the characters are described and are of quite significance.Compared to After Liverpool where there is no verbal description of the characters. There is no description of characters as it is irrelevant of who you are in this piece as all people are involved or could be involved in a relationship. The crucible is based on a true story and some of the characters were real people. The crucible is an allegory and was written as Arthur Miller wanted to express his views but couldnt so he uses The Crucible as an allegory to do so. Miller wanted to express his views about the McCarthy communist hunts in America.What he was face was that if America is so great and believes in freedom why is it that you were killed or exiled for believing in a contrary government to Americas own. Also The Crucibles main theme was mass hysteria and the community being ruled by the church and religion. After Liverpool besides uses symbolism in the apples by this is mingy is that the apple is representing the forbidden apple from the story of Adam and Eve. Both of theses plays are similar as both are about gaining power in a relationship in the crucible Abigail gains power over basin Proctor leading to his death.After Liverpool this is about relationships and communication between couples. It is preformed tout ensemble in chronological order with no flash backs unlike The Crucible tells you about past events. In After Liverpool each scene is only about the couples relationship and the communication or lack of the couples lack any past and never refer to the future. The Crucible is very detailed in its explanation of characters, which gives you an idea when execute of how to play each character. In After Liverpool there is no feature and it is entirely down to the person performing the piece.So it is an indication of how the performer sees the scene hap and maybe an indication on how they view relationships. The fact After Liverpool is written like this is also symbolic in that everyone can be in a relationship that is why the characters are labelled M and W. The reason they are labelled M and W is that it can represent anyone, which is rue as anyone can be in a relationship. The scenes did not have to be in any order this is also symbolic that the relationships in the play do not get anywhere they always end up request the same questions.They had no specific chronological order as everything was happening in the present. Having looked at both plays it has given me an insight of two very effective ways of portraying relationships both of them very different from each other. I preferred performing After Liverpool as I could use my own drama skills to play each character, which I think is a lot better, and I enjoyed it more. Also I found it easier to understand, as it utilise more modern language, which was easier to learn.