Why Standardized Tests Are Ineffective at Measuring a Student’s Capabilities

A Test Destined For Failure In America, standardise interrogation has become a prevalent method for testing the educational baron of students. Tests such as the SAT for College and the California STAR for elementary and jr. high students control been administered since the beginning of the 20th century. These tests argon often considered by many as crucial for the academic improvement of students into further education, such as an elementary student being promoted from third to fourth note or a high school senior applying to college.However, standardized tests have setbacks which could jeopardize a students future academic progression given he/she fails to pass. Therefore, I believe standardized tests ar uneffective at measuring a students capabilities and hence throw in with true(a) academic learning. Standardized tests assess the capability of the student to oppose to the test in an appropriate manner. It does not factor in true familiarity retention, the key element to a successful academic exam. Students who are faced with any form of outrage are most drastically affected by the consequences of standardized testing.The National Center for Fair and pioneer Testing (FairTest) calls these tests very inaccurate and encourage the use of overly academic, developmentally inappropriate primary learning. Inappropriate schooling is described as schooling not appropriate to the childs emotional, social or intellectual development and to the variability in childrens development. Students who are incapable of possessing necessary test-taking skills such as focus for long durations, budgeting time, etc fail these tests while their true knowledge of the material may prove otherwise.Students who rely on rote memorization and superficial knowledge pass the test when in fact they should not. Standardized tests are unremarkably and widely criticized for their bias towards children of privileged backgrounds who more likely than others possess a set of k nowledge and skills that result in higher scores. Alfie Kohn, an author on education writes ample families, schools, and districts are better able to afford test preparedness materials, and the most effective versions of such materials. It is fair to say then, that those receiving a poorer totally step education will be at a significant disadvantage compared to those who can or already received quality instruction and education related to the test. Charles Murray, a former Harvard graduate writes in his article overthrow the SAT for the journal The American, The SAT test isnt the problem. The children of the well educated and affluent get most of the top scores because they constitute most of the smartest kids.They are smart not because their parents are well educated, but because their parents are smart. Murray summarizes his whole point with a bold claim, if youre rich, you can buy your kids a high SAT score. Although the topic of standardized testing is widely debated and argued, the belief of such an important test with many innate flaws existing in the education system is shocking and appalling to many. Standardized tests were created to assess a students true academic potential.However, the variables and factors that influence these tests cause standardized testing throughout the world to be ineffective at that task. whole works Cited FairTest. How Standardized Testing Damages Education. FairTest. The National Center for Fair and wanton Testing, 20 Aug. 2007. Web. 9 Sept. 2011. . Kohn, Alfie. Standardized Testing and Its Victims. Education Week. Alfie Kohn, 27 Sept. 2000. Web. 9 Sept. 2011. . Murray, Charles. Abolish the SAT. The American. The Journal of the American Enterprise Institute, July 2007. Web. 9 Sept. 2011. .