Romeo and Juliet Inevitability of fate

denominate and its inherent inevitability have constantly found its modal value into Shakespeares work and the work influenced by him, a prime practice session of this is found within the very prologue of atomic number 53 of his largest pieces of work Romeo and Juliet.Within the prologue Shakespeare uses numerous literary techniques such as nonions of foreshadowing and dramatic irony that occur end-to-end the play, some more evident that others The fearful passage of their death-markd venerate this is an obvious indication of the cursed or uninevit fit fate that our main protagonists bequeath share at the end of the play.Shakespeare uses dramatic irony to emphasise the want that these two share and in turn play to the audiences curiosity. Despite this many a nonher(prenominal) readers rarely realise that the prologue is in fact written in sonnet form consisting of 14 lines, iambic pentameter and a rhyming couplet at the last line written.The structure may connote not whol ly the strong love that both Romeo and Juliet share for one another entirely also perhaps the love of constantly attempting to evade their fate and keep an eye on passion as opposed to reason.Romeo and Juliet are constantly seen to rebel against hunting lodges standards and the regulation set by their house, through this we are able to see that all love has an aspect of fate. Whether it be determined, or inevitable.Correspondingly, many of the poems found within the anthology share both the same connotations, structure and lexicon that we have found within the prologue. A main specimen of simile would be found within Sonnet 116, written by Shakespeare in 1609.This, as evident in its name is structured in sonnet form just as we have found in the prologue, yet again it does not speak directly of love yet instead as a description of what love is and is not. Love is not love.Which alter when it alteration finds Shakespeare here states that love is un bent or low-toned and therefo re cannot be created or destroyed, in this context we can evoke that love is therefore only a path in which one might set upon and that this is decided by only fate, Shakespeare states that you cannot love who you take in but instead love chooses you.It is an ever fixed mark Shakespeare goes on to describe what love is opposed to what love isnt and therefore sharing several similarities to the prologue, again describing love as a mark repayable to his repetitive connotation of love and fate within the prologue this may inculpate that this mark is in fact fate itself and therefore he allows Romeo and Juliets love to reside in the creation of his sonnets loves not times fool suggesting love is endless despite Romeo and Juliets fast approaching death.